The Criticisms Of Neuro Linguistic Programming
Any theory that comes to reality in this world has had to face its share of criticisms. It occurred with Archimedes and Newton when their physical theories came first to reality. But over a period of time, individuals accepted these theories with both their hands. The same kind of response had been given to neuro linguistic programming, and while the technique in itself is not so bad, neuro linguistic programming has generated quite some bad press for some years now.
One of the first claims of NLP to be disputed was that it is a scientifically respectable method. This claim of neuro linguistic programming did not have any scientific backing at all. It does have a rather impressive bibliography with terms like neurological levels, accessing cues, but that in no way means it can compete with legitimate disciplines like neurolinguistics or neuroscience.
NLP claims a lot, and while it claims, the lack of scientific proof to back these claims makes persons look down on this technique suspiciously. NLP, as the technique explicate, has laid the foundation for a lot of practices that could have definitely revolutionized the field of cognitive science and neuropsychology. Well, one thing is for sure ” Successive journals and periodicals published in these domains have failed to even mention the credits of neuro linguistic programming.
At the end of the day, you would believe in the credibility of any scientific theory when its backed up with necessary proof or research. In the absence of both, neuro linguistic programming suffers from an identity crisis. Though, a lot of practitioners still go about their business of practicing this technique, one may moderately say that any activity related to this domain is unregulated, at optimal.
NLP is commonly believed to be a technique that helps a lot in management training, life coaching and comprehending behavioral patterns of human beings. Since these concepts are closely related to the corporate sector, you would still find a lot of demand for neuro linguistic programming amongst corporate companies. That being said, the fact still stays that Generally, neuro linguistic programming is still an unproven science for numerous. There are many questions yet unanswered about this science, and till the time they are answered, the masses would find it challenging to adapt to this science.
The problem though is ” the interpretation of this science is overly easy for anyone to even think of challenging or proving the science. People just get down to implementing the techniques, which may not be the proper way ahead.
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
